Home
 

Friends

About Friends

OSX 10.3 to 10.5 install Jul. 18th, 2009 @ 09:32 am
[info]chuckvideo, posting in [info]macosx
I'm going to upgrade an older Intel iMac from OSX 10.3 to 10.5. Will I need to first install the interim 10.4 , or can I just jump from Panther to Leopard and skip Tiger?

Thanks in advance.

password storage Jul. 18th, 2009 @ 09:00 am
[info]vuzh, posting in [info]macosx
Can anyone recommend a free or cheap secure password storage program?

iCal Jul. 17th, 2009 @ 10:53 am
[info]jodamiller, posting in [info]macosx
Happy iCal Day.


Jul. 17th, 2009 @ 05:42 am
[info]not_kosher, posting in [info]macosx
http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/ele/1272617367.html

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

130-Watt Bi - M-Audio Amplified Studio Reference Monitors for real - pick up in BROOLYN only.

Never used, still in original box. Retailed for $600. My engineer uses them and They are the best monitors money can buy. If you're interested, drop me a line, and hopefully we can set something up.

One sub is opened but never used, the other is still factory sealed. The surround speakers (Kilpsch RS-3) were never opened either. The satellites (Quintent 1) were used gently less than 10 times. PICK UP ONLY in BENSONHURST.

These speakers sound phenominal, but I upgraded to professional studio monitors recently, and have no used to these anyone.

And if you're interested, I also have a Pioneer D509S 5.1 Dolby Digitial/DTS receiver, as well as a Kenwood DD/DTS receiver (sans remote) That I"m looking to get rid of. Everything is in perfect order, and you can find manuals to each and every item you're interested in purchasing by going to the manufacturers website in case of any trouble-shooting.

And if by some chance you're having a hard time finding specs or pictures of said items, try using Google's image searcher.

Apple rapes us just to rape Palm users. Jul. 16th, 2009 @ 10:04 am
[info]mymacsucks, posting in [info]macosx
Last night I was forced into rebooting for an update of Safari and iTunes. Supposedly, a web browser update required the entire OS to restart (yeah, right). Since the reboot failed (I didn't have the time to waste sticking around to supervise a Mac rebooting, I was on my way out), it basically resulted in a denial-of-service attack on the entire wireless shared internet portal here - the mac is the nameserver.

So I'm reading the news this morning and as it turns out, Apple fucked the entire Mac family RIGHT UP THE ASS for no purpose other than to rape anyone who happened to buy a Palm Pilot instead of one of those crappy phones they offer - phones that would remain pieces of shit no matter how well Apple made them simply because they only work with the extremely crappy AT&T network.

So the reboot was really necessary as a way to disable hardware, and it was labeled as coming from the Safari part of the update instead of the iTunes part of the update to conceal the fact that this was going on. Assholes.

I miss the Apple of the late 1980s and very early 1990s that gave us awesome tools to use our Macs any way we wanted, tools like ResEdit.

Subjecting every customer to a corporate sponsored denial of service attack just for the sake of engaging in anticompetitive business practices is a fucking outrage.

Didn't Mac users used to whine and bitch that Microsoft's OS was only popular because they did this sort of crap? Next time I hear a Mac user say something like that as a means of suggesting a Mac is somehow better, I'm going to throw a fucking pie in their face, same as was done to Bill Gates back in the day.

From http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090716/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_apple_palm_pre
SAN FRANCISCO -

Apple Inc. has shut down one of the most compelling features on Palm Inc.'s rival Pre smart phone, crippling the Pre's ability to act like an iPod.

Users of the recently released Pre had been able to put music on it by using Apple's free iTunes software — a unique twist for a device not made by Apple. But Apple updated iTunes on Wednesday to block this feature.

Apple spokesman Tom Neumayr said the update "disables devices falsely pretending to be iPods, including the Palm Pre."

Palm spokeswoman Leslie Letts said Apple's move is a "direct blow to their users, who will be deprived of a seamless synchronization experience." For a workaround, she noted, Pre owners can stick to the older version of iTunes, move music from computers to a Pre with a USB cable or consider third-party music applications.

The iTunes software smackdown is the latest example of tensions brewing between Apple and Palm, which since June has been led by the former executive behind the iPod, Jon Rubinstein. Rubinstein became Palm's executive chairman in October 2007.

The $200 Pre includes a "multi-touch" screen like Apple's iPhone, letting users do things like pinch photos to zoom in and out. Apple was granted a patent in January related to certain multi-touch functions, though the effects on Palm are unclear.

Avian Securities analyst Matthew Thornton said Apple's move to squash the Pre's iTunes function could turn off some people looking to buy the Pre, since they might have considered the device as a way to consolidate their music player and cell phone.

Still, "it's not like 10 out of every 10 people who buy a Pre are going to use the device for their MP3 player," he said.


Right. I hope someone DDoS's Apple's entire fucking domain for the next month or so. It'll keep those of us with Mac's from being attacked like this again, second, maybe it'll teach 'em a lesson. After all, It's not like 10 out of every 10 business transactions Apple conducts flow thru their website, right?

Tapping the Internet Brain Trust: XML files and Mac Excel 2008. Jul. 16th, 2009 @ 12:47 pm
[info]jackal, posting in [info]macosx
I have a web service that generates raw XML files.

I need this data in Excel.

If I curl http://fooservice -o foo.xml and try to open "foo.xml" in Excel, Excel pukes on it and refuses to open it since it's not an Excel XML file.

The only way I've found thus far to get the data into Excel is to do it manually. Load the URL into Firefox. Let Firefox do the graphical translation of the page from XML into HTML tables for viewing, then copy/paste the Firefox table into Excel. That works.

Problem is... i need a way to automate this. I can cron the curl call and have it grab raw .xml files, but I need a way to get them into HTML tables for Excel to be able to read it.

Any ideas? Help?

Update:

Got the solution:
curl http://foo.com//admin/tabular.xsl -o tabular.xsl;
curl 'http://foo.com/select/?q=SELECT+*+from+hardware&rows=5&format=xml' | xsltproc ./tabular.xsl -

Thank you, FARK Jul. 14th, 2009 @ 02:03 pm
[info]yalith
( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

If you ever have the opportunity to try crispy pig snoots... Jul. 9th, 2009 @ 04:38 am
[info]yalith
( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

Scrolling problem Jul. 9th, 2009 @ 09:20 am
[info]steverogerson, posting in [info]macosx
My Mac Pro has developed an interesting problem. It is constantly scrolling down. Say I am in a window and click on the top item, then it immediately scrolls all the way to the bottom. If I am in a Word document, for example, and click on the first word it scrolls straight down to the bottom. It is not a mouse problem as I've tried it with two different mice and even without a mouse, and it still does the same. I've rebooted to no effect. This is stopping me working and is very annoying. Has anyone any idea what might be wrong and how to fix it?


Edit: Ignore me, problem solved

Jul. 6th, 2009 @ 10:50 pm
[info]yalith
( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

LiveJournal iPhoto Exporter for iPhoto '08 (version 7) Jul. 6th, 2009 @ 11:23 am
[info]jackal, posting in [info]macosx
Is there a plugin for iPhoto that allows you to export photos to pics.livejournal.com that works with iPhoto '08 ?

The version posted on filmgold.com only works with iPhoto version 6.

Paulo Coelho Jul. 6th, 2009 @ 08:09 am
[info]rodneyorpheus

Paulo Coelho is not the literary world's most active Web aficionado, but he's certainly its most prominent. The Brazilian author has sold more than 100 million books, which include 14 short story collections and the novel "The Alchemist." He has been a fan of the Internet since the early 1990s. He spends at least three hours a day online, writing e-mails back and forth with his readers and posting photos on Flickr, MySpace and a blog.

Coelho's online activities also include a somewhat nefarious one: he likes to promote pirated copies of his own books. At the recent Digital, Life, Design Conference in Munich, Coelho told a gathering of tech company CEOs, artists and designers that since 2005 he's been directing his readers to an online site where they can download his books, in languages from German to Japanese, for free. "I always thought that when, at the beginning of your career, you strive to be read, you can't change your mind later and become greedy about it," he said.

Tell that to his publisher, HarperCollins. When reached by NEWSWEEK, a HarperCollins spokeswoman, Patricia Rose, said the publisher knew nothing about Coelho's online activities.

With his announcement Coelho is turning up the heat on an issue that's been simmering in the book publishing industry for years. In supplementing traditional promotional strategies, such as book signings and reviews, with free downloads, Coelho is championing a model that's gaining momentum among his fellow, albeit lesser-known, authors. Writers of technical manuals, academic books and fiction authors, like science fiction writer Cory Doctorow, have been putting their entire books online for free, with the consent of their publishers. Some authors claim that online publishing increases book sales by stimulating word of mouth. Publishers, for the most part, have been reluctant to endorse the practice for fear that it will undermine their sales and contracts for foreign rights and distribution. The trouble is, nobody really knows what effect free online publishing has on book sales, because there's almost no data to go on. "I think the Internet, for [publishers], is a very strange world, still," says Coelho's agent, Monica Antunes, from her office in Barcelona. "They can't make up their minds whether it's good or not good."

Whereas most authors who have embraced online publishing have done so openly, Coelho had been deftly hiding behind the anonymity provided in the digital world. His site, Piratecoelho, culls pirated versions of his books on sites like BitTorrent and eMule. He pays 10 fans scattered across France, Spain, Brazil, Russia and Turkey to find new pipelines for him to gather versions of his books onto the site. Visitors to his blog can click on an image of Coelho, resplendent in a neatly trimmed white beard, scarf and eye patch (he resembles an affable buccaneer in real life as well), and continue on to the site.

Coelho believes his online activities have only increased his already healthy sales. When he first came across a pirated edition of one of his books, in Russian, on the Internet in 1999, he put the link on his site, and the impact was immediate. Bookstore sales in Russia, a market in which Coelho was having distribution problems and where he had sold only 1,000 books, rocketed to 10,000 in 2001. He has since sold 10 million copies of his books, his agent says. His fans have downloaded complete editions of his books, in languages ranging from Spanish to Swedish, more than 20 million times in the past seven years. By publishing online, he says, "you give the reader the possibility of reading books and choosing whether to buy it or not."

Current Mood: impressed
Tags: ,

I can even screw up a mac. Oh lord. Jul. 5th, 2009 @ 11:21 pm
[info]catharsis_o_s, posting in [info]macosx
I'm using an OLD iBook with OS X 10.4.6. A while ago I managed to get my mac so stuck that I couldn't even get it shut down by pressing the power button. Obviously the next (not so) logical thing to do is take the battery out. And I did. I put it back and restart. I was doing this on work ofcourse and had to serve a customer after booting. I left my computer alone for about ten minutes, when I came back the screen was black and there was these white stripers running on it. I booted again, this time the computer respondet to the power button. This time the mac started on a tigers' welcome screen asking me to fill out all the information etc. I didn't really have any important files on this computer so it doesn't bother me that much. But the hard drive on this thing is really small, like 14gb, and i had some big files on it and they still seem to be there filling my hd. So my question is this, is there any way to restore those files, defragmet this thing, anything, so that i can get that space back? I bought this thing really cheap from my school, so i don't have any backup systems or cd's or anything really. Please help me out, this thing is dying on my hands.
Current Mood: drained

From Thomas Paine's "Common Sense"... Jul. 5th, 2009 @ 09:45 am
[info]rodneyorpheus

Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first a patron, the last a punisher.

Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built on the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him out of two evils to choose the least. WHEREFORE, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows, that whatever FORM thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.

In order to gain a clear and just idea of the design and end of government, let us suppose a small number of persons settled in some sequestered part of the earth, unconnected with the rest, they will then represent the first peopling of any country, or of the world. In this state of natural liberty, society will be their first thought. A thousand motives will excite them thereto, the strength of one man is so unequal to his wants, and his mind so unfitted for perpetual solitude, that he is soon obliged to seek assistance and relief of another, who in his turn requires the same. Four or five united would be able to raise a tolerable dwelling in the midst of a wilderness, but one man might labour out of the common period of life without accomplishing any thing; when he had felled his timber he could not remove it, nor erect it after it was removed; hunger in the mean time would urge him from his work, and every different want call him a different way. Disease, nay even misfortune would be death, for though neither might be mortal, yet either would disable him from living, and reduce him to a state in which he might rather be said to perish than to die.

Thus necessity, like a gravitating power, would soon form our newly arrived emigrants into society, the reciprocal blessings of which, would supersede, and render the obligations of law and government unnecessary while they remained perfectly just to each other; but as nothing but heaven is impregnable to vice, it will unavoidably happen, that in proportion as they surmount the first difficulties of emigration, which bound them together in a common cause, they will begin to relax in their duty and attachment to each other; and this remissness will point out the necessity of establishing some form of government to supply the defect of moral virtue.

Some convenient tree will afford them a State-House, under the branches of which, the whole colony may assemble to deliberate on public matters. It is more than probable that their first laws will have the title only of REGULATIONS, and be enforced by no other penalty than public disesteem. In this first parliament every man, by natural right, will have a seat.

But as the colony increases, the public concerns will increase likewise, and the distance at which the members may be separated, will render it too inconvenient for all of them to meet on every occasion as at first, when their number was small, their habitations near, and the public concerns few and trifling. This will point out the convenience of their consenting to leave the legislative part to be managed by a select number chosen from the whole body, who are supposed to have the same concerns at stake which those who appointed them, and who will act in the same manner as the whole body would act, were they present. If the colony continues increasing, it will become necessary to augment the number of the representatives, and that the interest of every part of the colony may be attended to, it will be found best to divide the whole into convenient parts, each part sending its proper number; and that the ELECTED might never form to themselves an interest separate from the ELECTORS, prudence will point out the propriety of having elections often; because as the ELECTED might by that means return and mix again with the general body of the ELECTORS in a few months, their fidelity to the public will be secured by the prudent reflection of not making a rod for themselves. And as this frequent interchange will establish a common interest with every part of the community, they will mutually and naturally support each other, and on this (not on the unmeaning name of king) depends the STRENGTH OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE HAPPINESS OF THE GOVERNED.

Here then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; here too is the design and end of government, viz. freedom and security. And however our eyes may be dazzled with show, or our ears deceived by sound; however prejudice may warp our wills, or interest darken our understanding, the simple voice of nature and of reason will say, it is right.

Current Mood: quixotic

Copying is not stealing, mmmkay? Jul. 5th, 2009 @ 09:10 am
[info]rodneyorpheus
I just left this on my friend Richard's blog when he discussed the "copying CDs is stealing" issue. I've been struggling with this for many years (one reason why I haven't made a CD in a while, I'm morally unsure of what it means anymore), but I'm slowly getting to a place where I think I am starting to understand this fully...

"Illegal downloading" is not the same as "stealing" either legally, practically, or morally. If you have a car, and I steal it, then I have a car and you do not. That's the definition of stealing: to take your property and thus deprive you of using it. It is predicated on the law of "scarcity of resource" - that stealing your food means you go hungry, since there's not enough food for both of us. or stealing your money means you can't afford to buy new food.

Digital information, since it is infinitely replicable for negligible cost, therefore CANNOT be stolen BY DEFINITION. Anyone who states that copying their music (or whatever) is stealing money out of their pocket either does not understand this fully, or is deliberately obscuring the real facts in order to profit.

In order to obfuscate this fast, large media corporations have been fighting on several fronts over the past years, such as:
  • creating propaganda to persuade people that replicating an infinite resource is morally wrong (using morally loaded terms such as "stealing" and "piracy" (neither of which it is)
  • paying politicians enormous sums of money to enact laws to make the free use and trade of digital information illegal (ironically often the same people who shout loudest about the virtues of the free market economy)
All of which is the digital version of King Canute attempting to command back the waves.

Therefore the challenge for any artist in the digital age is not how to constrain the infinite replication of their work, but how to profit from it, which is a very different thing. Take Magnatune: you can download stuff for free from there or you can choose to pay IF YOU WANT. Seems to work for them and their artists.

Take Radiohead: they offer their album for WHATEVER PEOPLE WANT TO PAY. So Radiohead are stupid, right? No-one is going to pay for something they are being offered for free... right? Hey guess what: the average payment was something over 2 bucks last I looked.

OK says the traditionalist, that a lot less than the $10 cost of a CD or MP3 from iTunes... but hey, guess what? The ARTIST doesn't GET that 10 bucks YOU pay. The record company does. The ARTIST gets a tiny share of that, maybe about... ummm... wow... TWO BUCKS. So how much money does Radiohead lose by offering their album for whatever you want to pay? Answer: zero. They can give it away and MAKE EXACTLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY AS BY SELLING IT FOR TEN DOLLARS.

Welcome to the digital economy my friend: where there's a lot of money to be made by giving things away for free. See GNU/Linux for a shining example.

But wait! There's more... Radiohead haven't just made the same amount of money. They have also given the record away to LOTS of people who would not, or could not, otherwise have paid for it. So NOW they have a fanbase who are massively more numerous than before. That's called GREAT MARKETING, and how much did it cost them? That's right: nothing. So not only have they made the same money as before, they've actually added value to their product!

As Cory Doctorow once said: my problem as an artist isn't piracy, it's OBSCURITY. No-one is going to pay for my work if they don't know who I am. Therefore it's OBVIOUSLY better to GIVE THE STUFF AWAY TO PEOPLE WHO WANT IT, rather than NOT sell it to people who don't know who the fuck I am in the first place.

And of course the WORST POSSIBLE THING I could do is hassle the people who WANT to hear my music: they are my FANS, my success DEPENDS on them liking me. So only an idiot would say that their fans are WRONG FOR WANTING TO HEAR THEIR MUSIC, right? I mean, really, what could be DUMBER than my criticising people for actually WANTING my work. But hey, guess again: THAT'S WHAT RECORDING COMPANIES DO.

Any artist who has a problem with people wanting to hear their music is a fucking idiot frankly.

I could rant about this for another couple of hours, but I have initiations to do... And yeah, I know I haven't written here in a while, Facebook kinda took over for a while there, but I have not fled LJ completely yet... :-)
Current Mood: sympathetic

Advertisement

Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com